System Design

  • Design & Manufacture Flow



  • Filter Design Data Sheet (Customer Checkup) - Write

    1. Purpose of Filtering
¡à Filtration ¡à Fluidizing ¡à Silencing ¡à Throtting
¡à Equalizing ¡à Seperation ¡à Sparging ¡à Projecting
¡à Degassing      

    2. FLUID SPEC    ¡à Liquid    ¡à Gas
Specification
PH Concentration            1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Flow rate m©ø/hr
Density Kg/m©ø
Viscosity Pa¡¤s
Operation temperature ¡É
Absolute pressure before the Operation kg/cm©÷
Permissible pressure drop kg/cm©÷
Wanted pressure drop kg/cm©÷
Clean delta P kg/cm©÷
Dirty delta P kg/cm©÷
Larger than 0.5¥ì m Suspended Solid removal efficiency > % - Guarantee value %


  • Filter Design

    1. Filtration Area - Filtration area & Differential pressure design


    * ¥á (Permeability coefficient) varies by the applied media.


    2. Dead-End Filtration


     


  • PTA (QTA) Solid Recovery System Metal Filter Application

    ¢Â PTA(QTA) Solid Recovery System

    ¢Â Test Condition

      1. Flux : 1 m©÷/hr
      2. Test Method :
            Test Start ¡æ Operation (45 min.) ¡æ Backwash (5 min.) ¡æ Start


      ¢Â Analysis Test Result (Test Analysis : Becton Dickinson )

        PTA MLSR SYSTEM
        FILTRATE ANALYSIS DATA

      Components Before Filtration After Filtration
      TA 3400ppm 983ppm
      p-TA 1260ppm 853ppm
      4-CBA NA 3.0ppm
      BA NA 327ppm
      Note 1)The components are saturated with water.

      ¢Â MLSR PILOT TEST RESULT



    • Final Results

      The PTA (QTA) Solid Recovery System bears absolutely no comparison to the Filter Cloth Method or Cross Flow Method of the CTA MLSR SYSTEM, and we have shown excellent results in efficiency and automation effects.
      The major factor of this result was from the superior backwashing effect, using an asymmetric poriferous metal membrane filter.



    • Project progress and Pilot test